Rate this post

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars

Join the discussion

5 comments

Share this article

Published on July 6th, 2009

Green Progress Report: Obama at Five Months

It’s been a busy first five months for President Barack Obama and his new administration. Between managing a devastating financial crisis, trying to pull the U.S. out of a recession and commanding two wars, one might wonder how any other priorities make it onto his agenda.

Yet, the President has managed to move forward on many environmental issues, even in this short period of time. Some environmental groups argue that he has not gone far enough, and that he’s made too many compromises; others worry that the regulations will end up hurting businesses and costing consumers too much money. Still, a look at the areas in which Obama and congress have been involved lately provides plenty of fodder for debate.

"So we have a choice to make," stated President Obama in March. "We can remain one of the world's leading importers of foreign oil, or we can make the investments that would allow us to become the world's leading exporter of renewable energy.  We can let climate change continue to go unchecked, or we can help stop it.  We can let the jobs of tomorrow be created abroad, or we can create those jobs right here in America and lay the foundation for lasting prosperity." Photo: Independent.co.uk

"How we produce and use energy is fundamental to our economic recovery, but also our security and our planet," Obama says. "And we know that we can't afford to tackle these issues in isolation." Photo: Independent.co.uk

Stimulating the Green Economy

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (also known as the stimulus package) is filled with a host of environmental measures.

The bill contains more than $70 billion in funding and $20 billion in tax incentives intended to develop, promote and support a green economy. Some of the highlights include:

  • $25 billion to improve the nation’s electricity grid and to improve efficiency in government buildings and low-cost housing
  • $10 billion toward research into renewable sources of electricity and automobile efficiency
  • $20 billion for public transportation and rail improvements, including the development of high-speed rail lines
  • Nearly $10 billion for environmental cleanup projects and to support clean water access, especially in rural communities
  • $6 billion for climate research and to promote the development of science and engineering jobs within the U.S.

Action From the Other Green Branch

Last week the House of Representatives passed the American Clean Energy and Security Act, a massive bill that is the first of its kind to seriously regulate greenhouse gas emissions. While the bill still needs to make it through a deeply divided Senate, it contains bold steps intended to address global warming. Too bold, or not bold enough, depends on whom you ask, but the ball is moving, and we may soon see Obama sign into law a bill containing some version of the following provisions:

  • Most notable is the cap-and-trade system, which allows companies who emit fewer greenhouse gasses (GHG) to swap with those who do, even as the net allowable limit shrinks from year to year. Eventually, the economic and legal incentives to shift away from GHG will turn industries away from their use.
  • The bill requires the U.S. to reduce its GHG emissions to 83 percent below 2005 levels by 2050.
  • Several provisions within the 1,300-page bill are intended to steer public utilities toward the use of renewable energy, while others deal with improving the energy efficiency of buildings (the largest emitters of GHG in the U.S.).
  • Taxpayers will bear some of the costs of this shift, but most provisions are not set to go into effect until 2012 when, hopefully, the current economic crisis will have passed.

Executive and Cabinet Power

President Obama and his Cabinet have also been busy issuing orders to address a host of policies, from auto emissions to federal land management. Here are some highlights from his various departments:

  • In May, the Obama administration issues new fuel efficiency standards for autos sold in the U.S., starting in 2012. They are among the toughest ever set, but they will yield a savings of nearly 2 billion barrels of oil –and the GHG emissions from their combustion– over the lives of these vehicles.
  • The Interior Department reversed a Bush administration decision to allow oil drilling near Arches and Canyonland National Parks and tabled plans for offshore drilling.
  • They also reversed rules allowing mountaintop removal coal mines to dump their waste near streams and have slowed the process of permitting companies to extract oil shale, a costly and environmentally devastating process.
  • Obama has signaled that he intends to regulate the emissions of power plants as well, but that may be covered in the Clean Energy Act, assuming it eventually finds its way to his desk.

All of these actions are encouraging signs that this administration takes climate change and resource management seriously, and with the Kyoto Protocol set to run out in 2012, the U.S. may emerge as a leader in December, when the world’s nations convene in Copenhagen to develop a new climate policy.

Bibliography: Green Progress Report: Obama at Five Months

5 Comments

  1. roselle

    posted on July 6th, 2009 at 5:42 am

    The Obama administration has done nothing to stop mountaintop removal mining for coal. Nothing. Indeed the EPA has approved over 60 new permits for MTR mines in Kentucky and West Virginia. The President has the power to do this horrible practice, and blowing up mountains and dumping the wastes into creeks and valleys is already illegal under the Clean Water Act. Obama is afraid of the coal industry, and because of this fear we are getting a climate bill which will do nothing to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. How can we Americans allow our government to be help hostage by the largest polluters on the planet?

  2. Sid Abma

    posted on July 7th, 2009 at 2:43 pm

    A few weeks ago the EIA informed the country that because of new methods of recovering natural gas, our natural gas reserves increased by 35%. That is a lot of natural gas.
    Natural gas is our “clean burning fuel”, and by only converting these coal fired power plants to natural gas would reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 1/2. Natural gas is delivered to site by pipeline and not by train. Natural gas leaves no ash that needs to be removed by truck or train.
    Natural gas is also our fuel source that is available here and does not have to be imported from those countries that don’t really like us anyway.
    Natural gas is also a fuel that can be combusted and utilized to over 90% energy efficiency. It can be emitted into the atmosphere at temperaturs below 100 degrees F. The technology has been available for over 25 years to accompish this, but because natural gas was and is still a cheap fuel our governments and industry were not concerned about energy efficiency of this fuel. We also were not concerned until just a few years ago about greenhouse gas emissions.
    Because times have changed, the the use of natural gas and using it efficiently must be promoted more.
    If industry consumes natural gas more efficiently, their operating costs will be less, and their profit margins will increase. This will not bring up the cost of the goods that they produce as many fear.
    If the natural gas power plants also apply the technology of “condensing flue gas heat recovery” the heat that is recovered from their waste exhaust gases could also benefit a neighboring industry with heated process water, reducing their costs.
    Enough energy has been wasted for enough years. It’s time to apply Energy Efficiency everywhere possible. It will make a difference.

  3. Kirk

    posted on July 7th, 2009 at 4:02 pm

    I’m with roselle, being under the impression O folks passed on Bush MTR bullshit, and I haven’t heard how shale and tar sand oil have been addressed, except that they’re exempted from EPA carbon assessments.

    What am I missing?

  4. john

    posted on July 8th, 2009 at 1:53 am

    Progress!

  5. Apollo Daily Digest » Blog Archive » July 7, 2009: U.S. Lags Other G8 Nations On Climate Change

    posted on July 17th, 2009 at 3:24 pm

    [...] recaps the Obama administration’s energy and environmental achievements of the last five [...]

Join the discussion



Recently Added to General

  • Economists Weigh in on Climate Change

    A new study found that an overwhelming majority of 144 top U.S. economists believe that climate change will have a negative impact on the nation’s economy.

    Eighty-four percent of participants in the study conducted by New York University School of Law …

  • Plans for Landfill Near Joshua Tree Stalled

    Plans to move in a new neighbor next to Joshua Tree National Park were stalled when a southern California appeals panel ruled to temporarily halt development of what would be the largest nonhazardous solid waste landfill in the nation.

    The proposed …

  • African Countries Receive $1.1B for Climate Action

    Six African countries were recently announced as the recipients of $1.1 billion in new grants and financing for climate action initiatives. Egypt, Morocco, South Africa, Mozambique, Zambia and Niger will share the additional resources to strengthen their investments in clean …