40% GHG Reduction by 2020? ECO Says: Yes You Can!

ECO, a newsletter published by non-governmental environmental groups at major international conferences, hits hard with its third issue at Poznań.

Produced cooperatively by Climate Action Network (CAN) groups attending the UNFCCC conference in Poland, the “Brown Coal” issue boldly states that industrialized nations can hit a target of 40 percent reduced emissions from 1990 levels by 2020, double the United States’ goal of a 20 percent reduction within that same time frame.

The ECO writes:

“The current crisis offers a tremendous opportunity. A ‘climate-smart’ rescue package in response to the financial crisis will create many green jobs, produce greener energy, and would avoid the dangerous lock-in of emissions from coal. Put simply it will make our economies more efficient, at a time when every penny counts and private investment flows are dwindling. A  ‘climate-smart’ package that focuses on economic innovation and jobs will be appealing to voters who are disenchanted with the hand-outs given to the banks.”

What About U.S.?

During the current economic climate, amid dropping oil prices and lower consumer spending, it is tempting to convert to cleaner energy sources. The ECO suggests that the U.S. could:

  • Cut its CO2 emissions from power plants almost 50 percent below 1990
  • Save $350 per year on average household energy bills
  • Increase GDP by 0.1 percent by 2030
  • Deliver a net gain of up to 1.5 million jobs by 2030

That could be a significant boost to the American economy, as recent estimates have reported that 1.9 million jobs were lost in 2008 and 533,000 in November alone.

“Each of the wealthy countries has massive capacity to mitigate emissions and move to a low-carbon economy, now,” said the ECO. “The technologies exist, the resources exist, now the political will must exist.”

Rate this post

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars

Join the discussion

1 comment

Share this article


Comments

  1. Bubba

    posted on December 5th, 2008 at 4:54 pm

    I just wanted to be first. I have never been first in my life. I am now over 90 and I hope to click this button first. In elementary school, when we had races, I was never first. When report cards came out I was always second,never first. When we went fishing, I was looking first at someone elses fish first. And so has gone my life perhaps until now. First at Last, First at Last. It is far better to be First At Last than Last To Be First.

Join the discussion



Recently Added to General

  • Future Packaging Could Actually Think for Itself

    The art of food packaging seems to be merging into the realm of science fiction, according to a report released by AZo Nanotechnology.

    As consumers become more selective about what qualifies as fresh food, research companies around the world are experimenting …

  • Top Environmental Degrees for Less Money

    As climate change and other major environmental issues continue to weigh heavy on voters’ minds, green jobs are increasing drastically.

    In fact, clean energy economy jobs grew by 9.1 percent between 1998 and 2007, while total jobs grew by only 3.7 …

  • Are Carbon Offsets Really Worth Your Money?

    Concerned about the carbon emissions from the last time you flew, drove your SUV or turned up your heater? Carbon offsetting may be the solution.

    Like pouring water into a bathtub, then draining the same amount of water you poured in, …

Earth911

Earth911 is an environmental services company that addresses solutions for products' end-of-life for both businesses and consumers.