Which Soda Packaging Has the Biggest Carbon Footprint?
Coca-Cola Great Britain teamed up with the Carbon Trust to determine the greenhouse gas emissions involved in the life cycle of glass, metal and plastic packaging, and found that the carbon footprint of glass packaging is more than double the impact of using aluminum cans.
"We are absolutely committed ... to reducing the environmental impact of our products. This is what our consumers expect and we believe is our responsibility as market leaders," said Sanjay Guha, President, Coca-Cola, Great Britain and Ireland.
The company estimates that packaging can account for as much as 70 percent of the overall carbon footprint of the product. The study took samples of 14 different Coca-Cola products, and even compared Coca-Cola Classic vs. Diet Coke (which had lower emissions).
The study was based on manufacturing and selling in Great Britain, but took into account manufacturing, distribution and disposal by consumers. For example, a 330 milliliter aluminum can of Coca-Cola Classic accounted for 170 grams of carbon emissions, while a glass bottle of the same size had a footprint of 360 grams. The study did not include results for plastic bottles.
Coca-Cola’s aluminum cans average 50 percent recycled content, while glass bottles are 40 percent recycled glass and plastic bottles have less than 25 percent recycled Polyethylene terephthalate (PET).
Meanwhile, in the U.S., consumers recycle about 45 percent of aluminum cans, 31 percent of PET bottles and 25 percent of glass containers.
“Today’s announcement is important as it will help bring home to consumers that carbon is everywhere—in all we consume,” said Tom Delay, chief executive of the Carbon Trust. “When we launched the idea around the carbon footprinting of products it was always our aim to have major brands, like Coca-Cola, using the process as a means to further reduce the carbon in their supply chains.”
As of June 17th 2011 we have upgraded our comment system to use Facebook comments. The below comments are closed and are listed for historical purposes.
pat
posted on March 12th, 2009 at 1:35 am
Seems a bit daft not including PET bottles in this study
Which Soda Packaging Has the Biggest Carbon Footprint? - Earth911.com | GlassnCraft.Com
posted on March 14th, 2009 at 4:25 am
[...] The rest is here: Which Soda Packaging Has the Biggest Carbon Footprint? – Earth911.com [...]
Peyts
posted on January 7th, 2010 at 12:54 am
The data for aluminium, glass and PET containers is presented at the Coca-Cola website, which is presented as a link in the article above. You can use the data to construct a comparative carbon footprint for the different products.
Importantly, you should compare products with reference to a common “functional unit”. Let’s say the functional unit is the containment of 100ml of Classic Coca-Cola. On this basis, the amount of CO2 (grams) associated with the packaging for the containment of 100ml is:
aluminium (330ml) = 29
glass (330ml) = 75
PET (500ml) = 21
PET (2000ml) = 8
So, buying a 2 litre bottle of coke is almost 10 times better than buying 6 x 330ml glass bottles (1.98 liters) provided you can enjoy the whole bottle with friends before you lose the fizz.
Cheers!
Peyts
Jennifer Grayson: Eco Etiquette: How Bad For The Environment Is Diet Coke? | Twitmerlin - News, Celebs Gossip, Social Media
posted on March 10th, 2010 at 7:16 am
[...] glass bottle: Super cool looking, not so cool for the environment: Retro-style Diet Coke has twice the carbon footprint of Diet Coke in the can, thanks to heavier transportation loads (read: more fuel). And although [...]