<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Scoop on Bioplastics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://earth911.com/news/2009/03/16/the-scoop-on-compostable-plastic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://earth911.com/news/2009/03/16/the-scoop-on-compostable-plastic/</link>
	<description>Make Everyday Earth Day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:41:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: What Bio Really Means - Hot News &#124; Quality Wars Blog</title>
		<link>http://earth911.com/news/2009/03/16/the-scoop-on-compostable-plastic/comment-page-1/#comment-36800</link>
		<dc:creator>What Bio Really Means - Hot News &#124; Quality Wars Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 02:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth911.com/?p=13395#comment-36800</guid>
		<description>[...] and more products are hitting the shelves that are made of bio-based materials and/or are biodegradable. Simultaneously, confusion and questions about what to do with these [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and more products are hitting the shelves that are made of bio-based materials and/or are biodegradable. Simultaneously, confusion and questions about what to do with these [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: North Carolina Law to Ban Plastic Bottles from Landfills &#124; Collect. Connect. Recycle.</title>
		<link>http://earth911.com/news/2009/03/16/the-scoop-on-compostable-plastic/comment-page-1/#comment-33153</link>
		<dc:creator>North Carolina Law to Ban Plastic Bottles from Landfills &#124; Collect. Connect. Recycle.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 18:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth911.com/?p=13395#comment-33153</guid>
		<description>[...] PET and HDPE represent the largest population of plastic bottles, a growing alternative are bioplastics. These are made of renewable materials that biodegrade in a commercial compost [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PET and HDPE represent the largest population of plastic bottles, a growing alternative are bioplastics. These are made of renewable materials that biodegrade in a commercial compost [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nieuwe banden gemaakt van olie uit sinaasappelschillen &#124; Dit Kan Niet Waar Zijn</title>
		<link>http://earth911.com/news/2009/03/16/the-scoop-on-compostable-plastic/comment-page-1/#comment-30685</link>
		<dc:creator>Nieuwe banden gemaakt van olie uit sinaasappelschillen &#124; Dit Kan Niet Waar Zijn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 21:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth911.com/?p=13395#comment-30685</guid>
		<description>[...] Sinaasappelolie wordt als een duurzaam beschouwd omdat het wordt vervaardigd uit een hernieuwbare bron. Dezelfde filosofie van het verminderen van aardoliegebruik wordt gebruikt in de productie van plastics uit maÃ¯s zetmeel of plantaardige olie. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sinaasappelolie wordt als een duurzaam beschouwd omdat het wordt vervaardigd uit een hernieuwbare bron. Dezelfde filosofie van het verminderen van aardoliegebruik wordt gebruikt in de productie van plastics uit maÃ¯s zetmeel of plantaardige olie. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sustainable Packaging Use to Reach 32 Percent by 2014 - Earth911.com</title>
		<link>http://earth911.com/news/2009/03/16/the-scoop-on-compostable-plastic/comment-page-1/#comment-28603</link>
		<dc:creator>Sustainable Packaging Use to Reach 32 Percent by 2014 - Earth911.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 19:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth911.com/?p=13395#comment-28603</guid>
		<description>[...] plastic strategies can include reducing the amount of material used, pursuing petroleum alternatives for plastic and increasing the recycling of plastic waste generated in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] plastic strategies can include reducing the amount of material used, pursuing petroleum alternatives for plastic and increasing the recycling of plastic waste generated in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BioProps</title>
		<link>http://earth911.com/news/2009/03/16/the-scoop-on-compostable-plastic/comment-page-1/#comment-25853</link>
		<dc:creator>BioProps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth911.com/?p=13395#comment-25853</guid>
		<description>It is in the best interest if the recycling facilities to suppress the use of bioplastic - they stand to lose lots of money. Kudos to NatureWorks for their research and proof that the number one argument of the recyclers is invalid.

I would love a ban to prohibit the use of oil based plastic to produce any item that is deemed &quot;disposable&quot;. I&#039;m sad that even items that are &quot;earth friendly&quot; and &quot;biodegradable&quot; are wrapped in ugly oil based plastic. 

Did you know we use 300,000 barrels of oil EVERY DAY to wrap the products we use in the US in plastic? Plastic around paper towels, toilet paper, and all those other things we just take off and throw into the garbage. I dare you to stand at the end of an aisle in the grocery store and look down and count the number of items you see that are wrapped in the non-renewable, oil based stuff. Think about how many of our soldiers have died protecting that precious oil so we can wrap our toilet paper in it. Oil based products have a cost that should not simply be measured in dollars.

The best way to promote responsible production and packaging is to insist that the products you buy and use are truly earth friendly - from the inside to the outside. If 300 million people insist that what they use is responsible, manufacturers will supply that demand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is in the best interest if the recycling facilities to suppress the use of bioplastic &#8211; they stand to lose lots of money. Kudos to NatureWorks for their research and proof that the number one argument of the recyclers is invalid.</p>
<p>I would love a ban to prohibit the use of oil based plastic to produce any item that is deemed &#8220;disposable&#8221;. I&#8217;m sad that even items that are &#8220;earth friendly&#8221; and &#8220;biodegradable&#8221; are wrapped in ugly oil based plastic. </p>
<p>Did you know we use 300,000 barrels of oil EVERY DAY to wrap the products we use in the US in plastic? Plastic around paper towels, toilet paper, and all those other things we just take off and throw into the garbage. I dare you to stand at the end of an aisle in the grocery store and look down and count the number of items you see that are wrapped in the non-renewable, oil based stuff. Think about how many of our soldiers have died protecting that precious oil so we can wrap our toilet paper in it. Oil based products have a cost that should not simply be measured in dollars.</p>
<p>The best way to promote responsible production and packaging is to insist that the products you buy and use are truly earth friendly &#8211; from the inside to the outside. If 300 million people insist that what they use is responsible, manufacturers will supply that demand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wintergreen</title>
		<link>http://earth911.com/news/2009/03/16/the-scoop-on-compostable-plastic/comment-page-1/#comment-25829</link>
		<dc:creator>Wintergreen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 01:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth911.com/?p=13395#comment-25829</guid>
		<description>How can we start a petition that we can send to the Federal Government to start to regulate the &#039;one-off&#039; plastic usage. This can range from picnic plates and cups to the trays for meat in supermarkets. We all know the plastic packaging found in supermarkets and department stores could be made of corn starch or cellulose by products. We are beginning to see packing peanuts being replaced by corn starch. Most styrofoam should be able to be replaced as well in packaging.

In order to make change, there needs to be some form of regulation to expect biodegradable &#039;plastic&#039; replacements. 

How can we do this together and get people aware that the materials are available but we need to regulate this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can we start a petition that we can send to the Federal Government to start to regulate the &#8216;one-off&#8217; plastic usage. This can range from picnic plates and cups to the trays for meat in supermarkets. We all know the plastic packaging found in supermarkets and department stores could be made of corn starch or cellulose by products. We are beginning to see packing peanuts being replaced by corn starch. Most styrofoam should be able to be replaced as well in packaging.</p>
<p>In order to make change, there needs to be some form of regulation to expect biodegradable &#8216;plastic&#8217; replacements. </p>
<p>How can we do this together and get people aware that the materials are available but we need to regulate this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Real Green Girl</title>
		<link>http://earth911.com/news/2009/03/16/the-scoop-on-compostable-plastic/comment-page-1/#comment-25768</link>
		<dc:creator>Real Green Girl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth911.com/?p=13395#comment-25768</guid>
		<description>I still say...BYO. Bring Your Own anything  - cup, plate, fork. Then we won&#039;t need any of those plastics.
Cheers,
Real Green Girl</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still say&#8230;BYO. Bring Your Own anything  &#8211; cup, plate, fork. Then we won&#8217;t need any of those plastics.<br />
Cheers,<br />
Real Green Girl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean</title>
		<link>http://earth911.com/news/2009/03/16/the-scoop-on-compostable-plastic/comment-page-1/#comment-25646</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 06:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth911.com/?p=13395#comment-25646</guid>
		<description>I would love to see a comparison of energy consumed and pollutants generated in the production processes related to petroleum-based plastics and bioplastics.  Is this information available?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to see a comparison of energy consumed and pollutants generated in the production processes related to petroleum-based plastics and bioplastics.  Is this information available?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shoey</title>
		<link>http://earth911.com/news/2009/03/16/the-scoop-on-compostable-plastic/comment-page-1/#comment-25601</link>
		<dc:creator>shoey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 00:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth911.com/?p=13395#comment-25601</guid>
		<description>would it not be cheaper to just have the more common plastics that are recyclable be used instead.  1--2 are more stable any way and if we can get to a point where we are recycling most or all of the plastic packages than we will save more energy than if we were to have to spend money on the machines to identify other plastics and natural resources. this is kind of counter productive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>would it not be cheaper to just have the more common plastics that are recyclable be used instead.  1&#8211;2 are more stable any way and if we can get to a point where we are recycling most or all of the plastic packages than we will save more energy than if we were to have to spend money on the machines to identify other plastics and natural resources. this is kind of counter productive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Association of Postconsumer Plastic Recyclers</title>
		<link>http://earth911.com/news/2009/03/16/the-scoop-on-compostable-plastic/comment-page-1/#comment-25590</link>
		<dc:creator>Association of Postconsumer Plastic Recyclers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 19:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth911.com/?p=13395#comment-25590</guid>
		<description>Association of Postconsumer Plastic Recyclers (APR) 
POSITION STATEMENT ON BIOPOLYMER USE IN BOTTLES

In order to sustain North America&#039;s post-consumer plastic bottle recycling industry, APR encourages the production of streams of baled bottles that do not contain contaminants.  APR has model bale specifications for two commercially recycled plastic bottles, PET and HDPE, listed on its website which provides guidance on bale purity.  Currently, PET and HDPE bottles represent about 95% of all plastic bottles used in the United States. Bottles made of resins other than PET and HDPE are often contaminants in bales of PET and HDPE bottles.

Until critical mass levels are achieved that allow for efficient system-wide reclamation, biopolymers may be an undesirable inclusion from a technical standpoint in both PET and HDPE bottle bales as are many bottles coded 3 through 7.   Until the volume of biopolymers bottles in the commercial stream reaches critical levels that allow for economical, independent recycling operations, individual reclaiming operations are likely to be highly selective in their interest in receiving biopolymer bottles.  Some reclaimers may find that processing some biopolymer bottles to sell recycled biopolymer plastic meets their business plans.

Automatic bottle sorting equipment based on near infrared spectra can distinguish some biopolymer bottles from PET and HDPE bottles and separate the biopolymer bottles.  The economics of such sorting is enhanced by high throughput and a substantial presence of the minor material, the biopolymer. Manually sorting biopolymer bottles that appear visually similar to PET or HDPE bottles containers would be problematic with regard to efficiency and accuracy.

To date most commercial biopolymers have a density greater than 1.0 gram per cubic centimeter.  Standard plastics recycling operations should separate biopolymers from HDPE, but not from PET, based on specific gravity. Biopolymers like other traditional polymers with a density greater than 1.0 g/cm3, should not be a technical issue to HDPE reclaimers, but would create a yield loss with some economic impact.  Hazing of clear PET resin is expected if the concentration of at least some biopolymers exceeds approximately 0.1%.  Biopolymers could be a technical problem and economic impact for PET reclaimers.

 APR encourages all plastic bottle designers and decision makers to examine the APR &quot;Design for Recyclability Guidelines&quot; at its website, www.plasticsrecycling.org.  APR continues to work with biopolymer manufacturers to identify and understand the impacts of biopolymers on the recycling of other bottle materials.

APR encourages discussions on one biopolymer, PLA or polylactic acid, be conducted with NatureWorks LLC, a PLA provider and an APR member, to identify and understand the impacts of PLA on the recycling of other bottle materials.  NatureWorks can be contacted at its website, www.natureworksllc.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Association of Postconsumer Plastic Recyclers (APR)<br />
POSITION STATEMENT ON BIOPOLYMER USE IN BOTTLES</p>
<p>In order to sustain North America&#8217;s post-consumer plastic bottle recycling industry, APR encourages the production of streams of baled bottles that do not contain contaminants.  APR has model bale specifications for two commercially recycled plastic bottles, PET and HDPE, listed on its website which provides guidance on bale purity.  Currently, PET and HDPE bottles represent about 95% of all plastic bottles used in the United States. Bottles made of resins other than PET and HDPE are often contaminants in bales of PET and HDPE bottles.</p>
<p>Until critical mass levels are achieved that allow for efficient system-wide reclamation, biopolymers may be an undesirable inclusion from a technical standpoint in both PET and HDPE bottle bales as are many bottles coded 3 through 7.   Until the volume of biopolymers bottles in the commercial stream reaches critical levels that allow for economical, independent recycling operations, individual reclaiming operations are likely to be highly selective in their interest in receiving biopolymer bottles.  Some reclaimers may find that processing some biopolymer bottles to sell recycled biopolymer plastic meets their business plans.</p>
<p>Automatic bottle sorting equipment based on near infrared spectra can distinguish some biopolymer bottles from PET and HDPE bottles and separate the biopolymer bottles.  The economics of such sorting is enhanced by high throughput and a substantial presence of the minor material, the biopolymer. Manually sorting biopolymer bottles that appear visually similar to PET or HDPE bottles containers would be problematic with regard to efficiency and accuracy.</p>
<p>To date most commercial biopolymers have a density greater than 1.0 gram per cubic centimeter.  Standard plastics recycling operations should separate biopolymers from HDPE, but not from PET, based on specific gravity. Biopolymers like other traditional polymers with a density greater than 1.0 g/cm3, should not be a technical issue to HDPE reclaimers, but would create a yield loss with some economic impact.  Hazing of clear PET resin is expected if the concentration of at least some biopolymers exceeds approximately 0.1%.  Biopolymers could be a technical problem and economic impact for PET reclaimers.</p>
<p> APR encourages all plastic bottle designers and decision makers to examine the APR &#8220;Design for Recyclability Guidelines&#8221; at its website, <a href="http://www.plasticsrecycling.org" rel="nofollow" class="extlink">http://www.plasticsrecycling.org</a>.  APR continues to work with biopolymer manufacturers to identify and understand the impacts of biopolymers on the recycling of other bottle materials.</p>
<p>APR encourages discussions on one biopolymer, PLA or polylactic acid, be conducted with NatureWorks LLC, a PLA provider and an APR member, to identify and understand the impacts of PLA on the recycling of other bottle materials.  NatureWorks can be contacted at its website, <a href="http://www.natureworksllc.com" rel="nofollow" class="extlink">http://www.natureworksllc.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: earth911.com @ 2012-02-12 04:39:45 by W3 Total Cache -->
