Obama’s 2010 Budget to Increase EPA Funding by 34 Percent

The Obama administration announced its proposed budget for the fiscal year 2010 which includes a significant boost in funding for the EPA. The $10.5 billion funding will be a 34 percent increase from 2009’s $7.8 billion in funding.

“It takes significant strides to ensure that our air, land, and water are safe and clean,” EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson said in her May 7 speech. “And it significantly improves accountability and transparency, ensuring fiscal responsibility at a time when every dollar counts.”

So what’s the EPA’s plan for the extra money? According to Jackson, $3.9 billion will go toward improving the nation’s water and wastewater infrastructure. Jackson says the funding represents a Obama’s dedication to improving the environment.

Lisa Jackson calls Obama's increased funding for the EPA a Photo: Wvgazette.com

Lisa Jackson calls Obama's increased funding for the EPA a "reflection" of his commitment. Photo: Wvgazette.com

“EPA’s new budget reflects the President’s commitment to growing a clean energy economy while protecting human health and the environment,” Jackson said.

EPA’s other plans include $475 million for the Great Lakes Initiative, $17 million for creating a greenhouse gas registry and $1.3 billion to clean up eligible hazardous waste sites, which is part of the Superfund site initiative.

Beginning in 2011, the government will reinstate the Superfund tax on businesses, generating $1 billion a year in revenue.

The new budget will also create jobs. The EPA plans to have enough money to hire 30 additional enforcement staff members in its Enforcement and Compliance Assurance Program.

“We see remarkable opportunities to create green jobs,” Jackson said. “We see new growth in communities that are cleaner, healthier places to live, work and invest. And we see new innovations that will protect our planet for the generations to come. EPA has been given extraordinary support, and a revitalized mission. We’re ready to get to work.”

  1. Kevin Grewe

    posted on August 31st, 2011 at 12:59 pm

    I would have cut all monies to this energy killing agency long ago. Another government agency we don't need and can't afford. Let the states take care of their own land and resources. Big brother FED has overreached way beyond it's authority into state right. Put this government on a diet. All you non constitutional drones can go to Europe and live there. Drive the small cars, sweat in the summer time and be charged an extra 20% tax on your energy bills so you can feel so greenish.
As of June 17th 2011 we have upgraded our comment system to use Facebook comments. The below comments are closed and are listed for historical purposes.

5 Archived Comments

  1. Joe

    posted on May 14th, 2009 at 7:30 am

    This is great news. After 8 years of incompetence, it is astonishing to witness an administration place funds where they truly are needed.

  2. Trey Granger

    Trey Granger

    posted on May 15th, 2009 at 4:55 pm

    Water treatment is definitely a smart expense. It’s so vital to our lives and yet so easy to contaminate.

  3. Bill Clinton

    posted on January 26th, 2010 at 9:53 pm

    Really great news… now we can hire 3000 full time employees to monitor storm water turbidity with really expensive turbidemetricomiters…

  4. Ronald Dabor

    posted on November 7th, 2010 at 5:29 pm

    Shouldn’t some of these funds be awarded to a completely independent institution to prove whether global warming is fact or farce.
    All these actions are taken as if global warming was true–before burying the country in green initiatives, why not see if IPCC has more lies up their sleeves.

  5. Edge

    posted on February 14th, 2011 at 8:55 pm

    Mr. Dabor wrote: “Shouldn’t some of these funds be awarded to a completely independent institution to prove whether global warming is fact or farce.”

    Yes, some independent organization. Like, perhaps, the National Academy of Sciences, established by an Act of Congress in 1863 to “investigate, examine, experiment, and report upon any subject of science or art whenever called upon to do so by any department of the government”? Perhaps that organization of approximately 2,100 members and 380 foreign associates, of whom nearly 200 have won Nobel Prizes, who are elected to the Academy in recognition of their distinguished and continuing achievements in original scientific research would be a sufficiently “independent institution” who could weigh on on whether this global warming stuff is “fact or farce?”

    Well, the NAS, in combination with science acedemies from 10 other countries stated in 2005: “There is now strong evidence that significant global warming is occurring. The evidence comes from direct measurements of rising surface air temperatures and subsurface ocean temperatures and from phenomena such as increases in average global sea levels, retreating glaciers, and changes to many physical and biological systems. It is likely that most of the warming in recent decades can be attributed to human activities. This warming has already led to changes in the Earth’s climate.”

    The NAS reaffirmed that conclusion in a 2010 report finding that “Ninety-seven percent of scientific experts agree that climate change is ‘very likely’ caused predominately by human activity.

    But perhaps an institution is only “independent” if it finds that global warming is a farce.

Recently Added to Hazardous

  • Battery Recycling Jumps 900,000 Pounds in 2011

    In 2010, Call2Recycle®, the North American leader in consumer battery recycling, announced that battery recycling records were crushed, up 10.1 percent from 2009 to 6.7 million pounds.

    Now, they have a similar announcement, only the percentage increase is even greater – …

  • A Reader Asks: What Do I Do With Nail Polish?

    Nail polish is a tricky thing – and we’re not talking about a clean paint job on your fingers and toes.

    Recently, an Earth911 reader, dubbed “Puzzled in Phoenix,” submitted a video question asking our editors what to do with her …

  • Saving Sharps, Saving Money: Recycling Medical Waste

    The following is an op-ed piece by Mike McInerney, vice president of Waste Management Healthcare Solutions. It does not describe the views or opinions of Earth911.

    How often have you visited the doctor, or had blood drawn, and noticed the nurse …

Earth911

Earth911 is an environmental services company that addresses solutions for products' end-of-life for both businesses and consumers.