California Pulls Styrofoam Ban

Citing the country’s economic conditions, California legislators have tabled Assembly Bill 1358 before it was due for a vote. The bill would have made California the first state to ban Styrofoam food containers.

There are already more than 20 cities in the Golden State that have outlawed Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) food containers. Styrofoam is a trademarked EPS product and is commonly used in take-out containers and coffee cups.

Because it is so light (comprised of 98 percent air) it is easily carried by wind and water currents to all reaches of our planet. Its unsinkable nature makes it a main component of marine debris. Photo: Momgoesgreen.com

Because it is so light (comprised of 98 percent air) it is easily carried by wind and water currents to all reaches of our planet. Photo: Momgoesgreen.com

Assemblyman Jerry Hill pulled the bill from consideration, fearing a loss of jobs for California EPS manufacturers. The bill also had opposition from industry groups including the American Chemistry Council, the American Forest and Paper Association and the California Restaurant Association.

While EPS is often less expensive than other food containers such as cardboard, it is an end product meaning it can only be recycled into more Styrofoam. Recent research has found that a bacteria found in beetles can break down Styrofoam, but in a landfill it will typically break into smaller pieces instead of decompose.

For food containers, it’s difficult to find recycling options in the first place. Cardboard containers that come in contact with oils are generally not recyclable because oil can’t be removed during the recycling process. Many programs that accept plastic will only accept it in bottle form, which would restrict non-Styrofoam plastic food containers.

As of June 17th 2011 we have upgraded our comment system to use Facebook comments. The below comments are closed and are listed for historical purposes.

Archived Comments

  1. Tim Dunn

    posted on August 18th, 2009 at 12:59 pm

    We make styrofoam products that biodegrade at no great extra cost. We can do this with all of the plastics used in disposable products. Unlike corn based plastics, our products don’t worsen the third world hunger problem. Essentially, the advocates of PLA (corn plastic,) ask that we ignore the world hunger problem, throw away a portion of the petroleum and natural gas that is a byproduct of refining fuel, and pay a great deal more for an inferior plastic. PLA only makes sense if you don’t understand its ramifications. See http://biogreenproducts.biz .

Recently Added to Plastic

  • Okabashi Closes the Loop on Sandal Recycling

    Shoes made from recycled materials are not a new green fashion trend: New Balance, Puma and even Manolo Blahnik have all turned waste into new kicks.

    But Georgia-based Okabashi goes a step further: Not only are its sandals and flip-flops made …

  • Schick Debuts Recycled Razor

    Many greenies opt for reusable razors to cut back on waste. But if you haven’t made the switch, Schick has found a way to make your disposable razor habit a bit more eco-friendly.

    The leading razor manufacturer is joining forces with …

  • Austin Residents Debate Bag Ban Online

    Late last year, lawmakers in Austin, Texas passed an ordinance to slap fees on plastic and paper carryout bags in 2013 and ban them outright by 2014. Although the city vowed to attain “zero-waste” by 2040, carryout bag legislation has …

Earth911

Earth911 is an environmental services company that addresses solutions for products' end-of-life for both businesses and consumers.