California Pulls Styrofoam Ban

Citing the country’s economic conditions, California legislators have tabled Assembly Bill 1358 before it was due for a vote. The bill would have made California the first state to ban Styrofoam food containers.

There are already more than 20 cities in the Golden State that have outlawed Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) food containers. Styrofoam is a trademarked EPS product and is commonly used in take-out containers and coffee cups.

Because it is so light (comprised of 98 percent air) it is easily carried by wind and water currents to all reaches of our planet. Its unsinkable nature makes it a main component of marine debris. Photo: Momgoesgreen.com

Because it is so light (comprised of 98 percent air) it is easily carried by wind and water currents to all reaches of our planet. Photo: Momgoesgreen.com

Assemblyman Jerry Hill pulled the bill from consideration, fearing a loss of jobs for California EPS manufacturers. The bill also had opposition from industry groups including the American Chemistry Council, the American Forest and Paper Association and the California Restaurant Association.

While EPS is often less expensive than other food containers such as cardboard, it is an end product meaning it can only be recycled into more Styrofoam. Recent research has found that a bacteria found in beetles can break down Styrofoam, but in a landfill it will typically break into smaller pieces instead of decompose.

For food containers, it’s difficult to find recycling options in the first place. Cardboard containers that come in contact with oils are generally not recyclable because oil can’t be removed during the recycling process. Many programs that accept plastic will only accept it in bottle form, which would restrict non-Styrofoam plastic food containers.

As of June 17th 2011 we have upgraded our comment system to use Facebook comments. The below comments are closed and are listed for historical purposes.

Archived Comments

  1. Tim Dunn

    posted on August 18th, 2009 at 12:59 pm

    We make styrofoam products that biodegrade at no great extra cost. We can do this with all of the plastics used in disposable products. Unlike corn based plastics, our products don’t worsen the third world hunger problem. Essentially, the advocates of PLA (corn plastic,) ask that we ignore the world hunger problem, throw away a portion of the petroleum and natural gas that is a byproduct of refining fuel, and pay a great deal more for an inferior plastic. PLA only makes sense if you don’t understand its ramifications. See http://biogreenproducts.biz .

Recently Added to Plastic

  • Kids Petition Crayola to Recycle Markers

    Written by Jenn Savedge, Mother Nature Network

    A group of elementary school students concerned about the environmental impact of Crayola products has launched Crayola: Make Your Mark!, a fast-growing campaign on Change.org that has already gained more than 59,000 signatures.

    The students, …

  • 16 Billion Beverage Containers Recycled in Calif. Last Year

    California might be the most populous state in the country at nearly 38 million people, but it’s high recycling rates are still staggering.

    According to CalRecycle’s Biannual Report of Beverage Container Sales, Returns, Redemption, and Recycling Rates, released last week, Californians …

  • San Fran Turns Transit Tickets into Trees

    It’s a common dilemma for regular subway riders: What do you do with all those leftover tickets with just a few cents of remaining value?

    San Francisco residents had a few disposal options for their old tickets from the Bay Area …

Earth911

Earth911 helps consumers find local recycling information through the largest and most accurate recycling directory in the U.S. Read today's top green lifestyle tips and ideas. Learn how we help businesses.