Buying Real vs. Artificial Christmas Trees

Stock Photo
The real versus artificial Christmas tree debate replays itself year after year. But the truth is, each option has its own place on the naughty-and-nice list.
Just a few short decades ago, displaying a Christmas tree in your living room really only yielded one option: a real pine or fir tree. That all changed when a U.S.-based toilet bowl brush manufacturer, the Addis Brush Company, created an artificial tree from brush bristles in the 1930s, acting as the prototype for modern artificial trees.
The Pros and Cons of Artificial Trees
Guilt. Many have made it the sole reason to invest in an artificial tree. The thought of cutting down a new tree each year can put a damper on the holidays for some.
Also, cost, convenience and environmental impact are other reasons consumers opt for an artificial tree.
Given the current economic climate, artificial trees may be especially appealing for their investment value when compared with the recurrent, annual expense of a real Christmas tree. Their convenience is also appealing to consumers as they don’t need watering, don’t leave pine needles all over the floor and transportation from tree farm to home isn’t an issue.
But many experts believe artificial trees actually have a greater negative environmental impact when all aspects of an their life cycle are considered.
Today’s artificial trees are typically manufactured with metal and polyvinyl chloride (PVC), a non-biodegradable, petroleum-derived plastic. In addition, many older varieties may contain lead, used as a stabilizer in the manufacturing process.
Despite their PVC contents, artificial trees are non-recyclable and non-biodegradable, meaning they will sit in a landfill for centuries after disposal.
Furthermore, approximately 85 percent of artificial trees sold in the U.S. are imported from China, according to the National Christmas Tree Association (NCTA), adding to their overall environmental footprint.
The Pros and Cons of Real Trees

Stock Photo
Approximately 33 million real Christmas trees are sold in North America each year, according to the U.S. EPA. Luckily, about 93 percent of those trees are recycled through more than 4,000 available recycling programs.
Also known as “treecycling,” the act of recycling a Christmas tree is a leading reason many experts agree they are more environmentally friendly than their plastic counterparts.
SEE: Everything You Need to Know About Treecycling
Treecycling is an easy way to return a renewable and natural source back to the environment instead of disposing it in a landfill, where decomposition rates are slowed due to lack of oxygen.
Christmas trees are recycled into mulch and used in landscaping and gardening or chipped and used for playground material, hiking trails, paths and walkways. They can be used for beachfront erosion prevention, lake and river shoreline stabilization and fish and wildlife habitat.
A single farmed tree absorbs more than 1 ton of CO2 throughout its lifetime. With more than 350 million real Christmas tress growing in U.S. tree farms alone, you can imagine the yearly amount of carbon sequestering associated with the trees. Additionally, each acre of trees produces enough oxygen for the daily needs of 18 people.
In order to ensure a healthy supply of Christmas trees each year, growers must use sustainable farming techniques. For each tree harvested, one to three seedlings are planted the following spring, ensuring a healthy supply of trees.
According to the NCTA, the Christmas tree industry employs more than 100,000 Americans, an important economic consideration in the real versus artificial debate.
Besides the aforementioned cons associated with real Christmas trees, they are farmed as agricultural products, meaning repeated applications of pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers may be used throughout their lifetime. The ideal tree would be raised organically, using integrated pest management techniques rather than chemicals.
Another con associated with real Christmas trees may depend on where you live. For climates where coniferous trees don’t grow, that tree in your living room may have had to travel hundreds of miles to reach the lot, significantly impacting the environmental impact associated with travel. However, a tree trucked from a couple states away is still traveling thousands of miles less than one from overseas.
The Verdict?
So, what’s the final word? Drumroll please… Real trees top our charts for holiday adornment. Even though they might shed needles on your floor, the investment in a U.S.-based product, the carbon-neutral nature of their production and their ease of recycling make them a clear winner.



Tat XtremeSaver Clinard
posted on December 1st, 2011 at 4:43 pm
Janice Noble Bartholomew
posted on December 1st, 2011 at 4:48 pm
Jenny Hall
posted on December 1st, 2011 at 4:55 pm
Janet Opdahl
posted on December 1st, 2011 at 5:18 pm
Ora Nez
posted on December 1st, 2011 at 5:18 pm
Barbara J. Hagan
posted on December 1st, 2011 at 5:29 pm
Janice Nelson Null
posted on December 1st, 2011 at 5:49 pm
Danny Canales
posted on December 1st, 2011 at 7:13 pm
Javier RG
posted on December 1st, 2011 at 8:09 pm
Mari Garcia
posted on December 1st, 2011 at 10:18 pm
Jennie Foarde Faurote
posted on December 1st, 2011 at 8:36 pm
Beverly Richardson Harn
posted on December 1st, 2011 at 9:31 pm
Jennie Foarde Faurote
posted on December 2nd, 2011 at 12:34 am
Stephanie C Hall JD
posted on December 1st, 2011 at 9:12 pm
Jodi Sims-Klusacek
posted on December 1st, 2011 at 10:11 pm
American Christmas Tree Association
posted on December 1st, 2011 at 10:52 pm
Jackie Louis
posted on December 1st, 2011 at 11:35 pm
Blair Stilwell
posted on December 2nd, 2011 at 9:46 pm
Ralph Weitz
posted on December 25th, 2011 at 12:18 pm
Maddy McKenna
posted on December 2nd, 2011 at 10:18 pm
Dianne McKenna
posted on December 3rd, 2011 at 5:42 am
Peg Donovan
posted on December 4th, 2011 at 1:41 pm
Maria Ruiz
posted on December 4th, 2011 at 5:01 pm
Scott Riddle
posted on December 5th, 2011 at 4:44 am
Joe Rittman
posted on December 5th, 2011 at 5:06 am
Filis Phyllis Warren
posted on December 5th, 2011 at 4:21 pm
Lisa Louis Teagardner
posted on December 5th, 2011 at 4:46 pm
Sivje Crowe Parish
posted on December 5th, 2011 at 9:15 pm
Llyn Peabody
posted on December 6th, 2011 at 5:50 am
Ruth Escher
posted on December 6th, 2011 at 9:34 pm
Llyn Peabody
posted on December 8th, 2011 at 7:54 pm
A J Anitra Clemons
posted on December 6th, 2011 at 7:47 pm
Naiya McMurtry Supica
posted on December 6th, 2011 at 9:36 pm
Robert A Hanson
posted on December 13th, 2011 at 5:39 am
Michele Parry
posted on December 7th, 2011 at 2:13 am
Mayur Bhave
posted on December 7th, 2011 at 5:40 am
Roxanne Cote
posted on December 7th, 2011 at 2:54 pm
Good Food Quest
posted on December 7th, 2011 at 6:12 pm
Margery Hilburn
posted on December 7th, 2011 at 8:01 pm
Monica Beach Wilcox
posted on December 7th, 2011 at 10:09 pm
Cheri Robertson
posted on December 8th, 2011 at 3:43 am
Mary Elizabeth Condon
posted on December 8th, 2011 at 3:55 pm
Sarah Dudziak
posted on December 8th, 2011 at 8:52 pm
Emily Holtel-Hoag
posted on December 8th, 2011 at 9:06 pm
Christopher McGurr
posted on December 8th, 2011 at 10:06 pm
Michael Reynolds
posted on December 9th, 2011 at 3:32 pm
Lilka Walewska
posted on December 9th, 2011 at 8:45 pm
Alan G. Harris
posted on December 12th, 2011 at 1:28 pm
Hannah Mich
posted on December 12th, 2011 at 5:21 pm
Lisa Hart-Matusewicz
posted on December 14th, 2011 at 4:28 am
Linda Andrews
posted on December 14th, 2011 at 10:02 pm
Jackie Louis
posted on December 17th, 2011 at 3:47 am
Liz Reckinger Schoen
posted on December 19th, 2011 at 2:05 pm
Willow Turtle
posted on December 19th, 2011 at 3:59 pm
Ginny Speitel LeClair
posted on December 19th, 2011 at 9:30 pm
Ralph Weitz
posted on December 24th, 2011 at 3:55 pm