An E-Waste Solution?

In today’s fast paced, technology-driven world, it seems like the minute the latest gadget hits your hand it’s nearly obsolete, with another upgraded version ready to take its place in a matter of months.

This is great news for the technology market, but it presents a unique challenge for waste management: the continuous growth of e-waste.

According to the California Department of Toxic Substances Control, e-waste is “any unwanted electronic device” and “frequently contains hazardous materials, predominantly lead and mercury.” According to the EPA, the U.S. is the world’s leader in generating e-waste.

Photo: Amanda Wills,

The Electronics TakeBack Coalition estimates that the U.S. exports enough e-waste each year to fill 5,126 shipping containers, which when stacked, would reach 8 miles high. Photo: Amanda Wills,

To help address the e-waste dilemma on a global level, the newly created Ewaste Foundation, based in the Netherlands, aims to decrease the e-waste problem in developing countries by neutralizing waste during the disassembling process.

Although the organization was just created in August, the non-profit group has big plans for a global impact.

The Issue with E-Waste

As developing countries embrace technological trends, older electronics are finding their way into nations’ waste management systems.

In the U.S. alone, the EPA estimates that nearly 40 million computers become obsolete each year. In addition to computers, devices such as televisions, computer accessories, printers, scanners, fax machines, cell phones and more are also considered e-waste.

Of the 2.25 million tons of TVs, cell phones and computer products ready for end-of-life (EOL) management, 18 percent was collected for recycling and 82 percent was disposed of primarily in landfills, according to the EPA. Once disposed, e-waste products are handled as hazardous waste and are often securely stored, placed in hazardous waste landfills, sent back to the manufacturer to be refurbished or sent to developing countries to be disassembled.

Many e-waste exportation critics claim that workers overseas often work in dangerous conditions, and piles of e-waste are often dumped close to where large populations of people live. To help combat this growing problem, the Ewaste Foundation neutralizes e-waste once it makes its way to Africa, where many tons of e-waste are dissembled yearly.

The Ewaste Foundation Takes on the Challenge

Much like certificates that people can purchase to “offset” their carbon footprint, the Ewaste Foundation sells certificates to technology users to offset their e-waste footprint. Paul de Jong, founder and executive director of the Ewaste Foundation, says that once a certificate is purchased, the foundation will immediately begin to neutralize that amount of e-waste.

Photo: Flickr/CP

According to the EPA, Americans own approximately 24 electronic products per household. Photo: Flickr/CP

Although the organization is still in the fundraising stage, de Jong says they plan on neutralizing African e-waste in two key ways:

  • Transporting the hazardous leftover materials from sustainable e-waste disassembly processes out of Africa to Europe
  • Establishing efforts to enlarge the capacity of sustainable e-waste disassembly in Africa by setting up criteria and requirements, supporting new and improved initiatives and making e-waste disassembling profitable so new e-waste businesses can be established

“Our belief is that by helping e-waste management projects in these ways facilitates and makes possible a faster growth of their [e-waste disassembling plants’] capacity,” de Jong says. “This is an important aspect, as the current capacity of sustainable e-waste disassembly in Africa is nearly zero.”

Future Goals and Initiatives

According to the Ewaste Foundation’s Web site, purchasing certificates to help fund the organization gives technology users a direct and fast way to offset their footprint and helps the organization provide practical help to the sustainable e-waste process.

In addition to getting the entire process of neutralizing e-waste started once enough funding is available, the Ewaste Foundation is looking to partner with companies to help with exporting the hazardous waste from Africa to proper disposal in Europe.

“Next to selling certificates, we are looking for larger companies or institutes who want to fund us by ‘adopting’ a container of hazardous leftovers we take back from Africa on a regular basis,” de Jong adds.

And, although his organization is based in Europe, de Jong says American individuals and companies can be a vital part of helping the Ewaste Foundation take off and address the African e-waste problem.

“Our initiative in solving African e-waste is vital because its focus is in taking practical action at the back end of the e-waste stream,” he says.

Recent Posts
Latest posts by Michelle Talsma Everson (see all)


  1. I’m weary of the ewaste offsets just like I’m weary of carbon offsets.

    Companies and municipalities in the US should pay the cost of true recycling upfront and work only with companies that do not export…not an easy task. When Chinese brokers are paying $2 per CRT monitor and it costs upwards of $5 to send them to a glass processor in the US, the choice is a very hard one to make.

    I work for CompuCycle out of Houston. We charge for recycling, and it’s something we’ve got to be proud of. Luckily Earth911 readers know the difference between green and greenwashed, but a lot of consumers out there think all recyclers are equal.

  2. I try stoping many Ewaste entering to China. and other country.
    It is mostly the The sound so good and huge recycler who ships them off sea.
    The small Recyclers most likely repairs the and resell them in the USA or local store

  3. Good day.

    We have solutions to the e-waste issues. Please review our web site, and contact Myself, or other members of our organization. We have been providing proper solutions for many years, and are continuing to add new processes for EOL GADGETS, etc.

    How can we particicate in your removal program, we are interested in Worldwide solutions.

    Thank you, and keep up the good work.

  4. In response to Zoe Russel

    Despite some people have criticism on carbon offsetting the volunary market worldwide has doubled in 2008 reaching a volume of USD 705.000.000.

    Now E-waste offsetting is totally new, and of course -like carbon offsetting- also getting criticism. I would like to emphasize Ewaste Foundation as everyone is opposed to the export of Ewaste. We only approve the exporting of WORKING ICT equipment too developing countries in order to get a second life (which is necessarry to close the digital gap with these countries).

    And next to the illegal streams of exported ICT, also for the normally used ICT equipment which becomes end-of-life in developing countries, there is lack of a proper disposal process. Capacity building for proper local disassembly is essential. This is among other things the main goal of Ewaste Foundation. We would like others to support us in this work an help us in different possible ways!

    visit us at

  5. In response to Paul de Jong…

    Unfortunately, shipping working electronics, while getting around the legal barriers of shipping electronics overseas, isn’t always the environmentally sound thing to do. You also have to look at the economics of what you’re shipping.

    I recently talked with a buyer looking for CRT monitors for shipment to Egypt. I was offered from $2 for old white monitors to as much as $17 for newer black ones. In researching the markets, it turns out that while the more expensive monitors were being legitimately resold into local markets, the $2 monitors were being used for parts in building TVs with the remainder going to dump sites.

    It’s not enough to test if the equipment you ship works. If you really want to do the environmentally right thing, you have to do your due diligence in finding out what’s going on with the electronics you sell overseas, and you need to pay attention to the economics of the equipment you ship.

    For this reason, my company doesn’t ship electronics overseas, working or otherwise, unless we’re sure that it’s not going to end up being used for parts with most of it ending up in a landfill. A lot of companies claim to have a zero landfill policy, but many turn a blind eye to what they’re really doing.

  6. Great article Michelle.
    As quoted, “Electronic equipment has been characterized as a fast growing category of municipal solid waste. Experts predict consumers will be replacing equipment more often in the future, leading to greater waste. According to the US Environmental Protection Agency, in 2005, discarded electronics totaled about 2 million tons. It’s estimated that only about 15 to 20 percent of this was recycled.”

    For those who have larger amounts of solid waste, companies in your area sell large ewaste solutions. Check out Pretty cool.

Leave a Comment