Seattle Considers Reduced Garbage Collection For More Recycling

Share this idea!

Seattle's plan would offer two waste diversion plans per week and require those who don't recycle or compost to store material for an extra week. Photo: Flickr/erintongay

Seattle is contemplating a plan to reduce its garbage pick-up service to bi-weekly collection starting in 2013, which would save $6.4 million and reduce the amount of recyclable material that ends up in landfills, as first reported by The Seattle Times.

The city hopes to start a pilot program next year, sampling 400 to 800 households with reduced collection to determine the public participation.

One of the reasons why Seattle would be able to offer less garbage collection is because of the city’s organic waste collection program. This program accepts both yard and food waste on a weekly basis, which would not be changed under the proposed plan.

Combined with the city’s weekly recycling collection program, the new plan would offer two waste diversion plans per week and require those who don’t recycle or compost to store material for an extra week.

The EPA estimates that food and yard waste accounts for 25 percent of total waste, all of which can be diverted from landfills using Seattle’s curbside programs. Seattle’s program also accepts meat and dairy products, which often pose challenges in home composting systems.

The city can save money by reducing garbage collection because not only will less trucks be deployed, but there will be fewer landfill disposal costs. This is in addition to any cost savings associated with selling off recyclables and using the compost made from organic waste for city parks.

Seattle’s push for zero waste does not stop with residential collection. The city has required its restaurants to offer single-use packaging that is compostable or recyclable, and is considering legislation to address phone book waste.

A similar alternative used by several cities in the Northeast is Pay-as-You-Throw (PAYT), where customers are charged per bag of garbage collected in order to incentivize recycling and composting.

Related articles
Delaware Passes Landmark Universal Curbside Recycling Program
Recycling Programs Losing Money, But Residents Are Still Paying
U.K. Residents to Recycle Food Waste Curbside

Recent Posts

Trey Granger

Trey Granger is a former senior waste stream analyst for Earth911.
Trey Granger

Latest posts by Trey Granger (see all)


  1. Again , here we go with municipalities FORCING their wishes on us. Organic waste at my house get flushed down the toilet, so no increased fee’s for having a garbage disposal and I’ll be damned if I’ll go along with this “pay as you throw ” crap. Like I’ve said before, if they go to that, there are lots of dark back roads around here that my trash will end up on, then the ciunty can deal with it anyway. I WILL NOT be forced into this recycling nonsense and end up basically gift wrapping the garbage!!

  2. I would LOVE this program. Since I started composting non-meat food waste in the back yard I’m down to less than a bag of trash a week. In NJ we pay over $85 a ton to landfill trash so reducing solid waste at the curb makes sense. I also think single stream recycling in a 90 gal toter works best for traditional recyclables. It’s a shame Bill thinks managing solid waste is like gift wrapping but trust me, you don’t want to see the alternative.

Leave a Comment